Injection Molding vs. 3D Printing: Which One is More Cost-Effective for Your Project?

3D printing and prototyping are among our specialties here at HLH Proto. We have had the privilege to help over 3,000 companies in 50 countries bring their designs to life efficiently and economically. While 3D printing offers rapid prototyping advantages, we acknowledge concerns regarding its cost compared to traditional manufacturing methods like injection molding.

We provide both 3D printing and injection molding services because we understand their unique benefits for creating prototypes and manufacturing final parts. The most suitable method depends on the specifics of your project, which is why we encourage you to consult with our experts. They can help you determine the best and most cost-effective solution for your needs. In this guide, we’re also sharing insights and factors to consider to help you make an informed decision for your current or future projects.

Your production scale

Injection molding becomes cost-effective for high-volume production of identical plastic parts for testing or end-use. However, for smaller production runs of up to 100,000 units, we recommend 3D printing and prototyping due to its cost-efficiency.

Your production timeline

3D printing offers shorter lead times, although the production rate might be slower than injection molding. Nonetheless, the tooling costs associated with injection molding for low-volume projects can escalate the overall expense, making 3D printing and prototyping a more financially viable option for those looking to minimize costs.

HLH Proto is equipped with the latest, most sophisticated 3D printers, enabling us to produce custom parts on demand quickly. Regardless of your timeline, we can complete components within days to ensure timely delivery.

The part design

Complex shapes or features are no obstacle for our 3D printing and prototyping services, including DMLS and SLS technologies. These methods are ideal for producing designs with intricate details, such as gaps, branches, spaces, and other complex elements, which are often challenging for injection molding to replicate.

Surface finish and strength

3D printing might result in parts with visible layers or a slightly rough texture, but this can be improved with post-processing. For projects where time is of the essence, injection molding is advantageous as it produces parts with a smoother finish and greater strength in one single process, unlike 3D-printed parts that may have weaker points at layer junctions.

If you still can’t decide about injection molding or 3D printing and prototyping, talk to us today for advice and get a quote in the process. Our team at HLH Proto is ready to help you make an informed choice.


Industry InsightsDownloadsQA/QCDesign Tips


CNC Machining ServicesDie CastingRapid Injection Molding3D PrintingSheet MetalVacuum Casting


Aerospace & UAVAutomotiveCommunicationsConsumer ProductsIndustrialMedical
Product DevelopmentRobotics & Automation


CNC Machining ServicesDie CastingExport ToolingRapid Injection MoldingLow Volume Manufacturing Whitepaper


Room 1231, Wanjiali International Mall, Wanjiali Middle Road No.99, Furong District,Changsha,Hunan province,China,410016